By: Roberto Villarreal

Roberto Villarreal — Sun, 05 Sep 2021 04:17:47 +0000

I believe the focus for voters, should be to ensure strict enforcement. A very critical examination of how the various Tribal Gaming Commissions and NIGC currently enforce California tribal casinos must be openly debated.Today, Americans gambling at Californias Indian casinos have minimal recourse, when reporting serious electronic promotional violations. The history of the Tribal casinos enforcing these types of violations is poor or non existent. The violations never get officially disclosed to the public, because the tribe enforces itself. And the NIGC provides recommendations, not enforcement. The SBGC claims no authority to enforce these types of violations either. Ultimately the NIGC and DOI are responsible for protecting Americans from financial harm caused by tribal casinos. California tribal casinos ability to accurately program and process electronic aspects of gaming should be reviewed. These same electronic promotions will be connected with all new betting. Only tribal casinos with a record of fair, transparent, proactive, and stringent enforcement should be considered. California’s gamblers assume they are protected. There is no comparison between state run enforcement (nevada), and the Tribal self enforcement and NIGC oversight in California. I intend on factually covering it. I have had numerous encounters with all 3 Commissions. I suggest their opposition run on trust and integrity and force the tribes to discuss their track record in this area. The gamblers actually fund everything involved. And nobody is covers their viewpoint. It’s the only area of the proposal which will directly affect California gamblers. The demographic that actually funds it.

LOVEJILI login.Claim Your Free 999 Pesos Bonus Today

By: Roberto Villarreal