Long Island Casino Environmental Review Moves Forward
Posted on: December 7, 2023, 04:38h.
Last updated on: December 8, 2023, 06:14h.
Amid legal challenges from Hofstra University, an environmental review that’s a necessary component of Las Vegas Sands’ efforts to potentially build a casino hotel in Long Island, NY is proceeding.
On Tuesday, policymakers in the town of Hempstead voted unanimously to make the town the go-to regulator for the State Environmental Quality Review Act exercise. That study will determine the viability of Sands’ plan to build a $4 billion casino resort at the site of the Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Uniondale, NY.
Hempstead halted efforts to take the lead in the State Environmental Quality Review Act procedure last month. That’s when New York State Supreme Court Judge Sarika Kapoor ruled that Nassau County’s transfer of Coliseum’s lease to Sands violated ?New York’s open meeting laws. That ruling was later subject to a hold issued by the appellate division of the New York State Supreme Court.
Hofstra, the plaintiff in the suit heard by Kapoor, has asserted that Nassau County officials didn’t give the public adequate avenues or time to make their voices heard on the casino issue. That’s while other groups opposing the project claimed no efforts have been made on the environmental review process.
Hempstead, Sands Look for Transparency
Opponents of the Nassau County casino plan have alleged lawmakers approved the deal with Sands in a backroom fashion, and that processes concerning related regulatory reviews have been shrouded from public comment.
Conversely, supporters of the integrated resort assert that Long Island politicians have made abundantly clear their backing of the Sands proposal, noting that there have been numerous meetings at which residents voiced endorsements for the project.
As for the environmental review process, Hempstead lawmakers voted to use a review drafted by Sands as a template and to hold two related review sessions on January 18 at the Long Island Marriott in Uniondale.
The Uniondale Chamber of Commerce is among the groups backing the Sands proposal. The chamber leader noted many local businesses, including restaurants, are supportive of the Sands casino proposal. For LVS, the location is desirable because Nassau County is the second-most populous county in New York after New York City. Additionally, Long Island is a short drive to the Kennedy and LaGuardia airports.
Environmental Review Critical Piece of Puzzle
Legal experts speculate that Hofstra’s case centers around sending Nassau County and Sands back to square one, potentially betting that a lengthy legal battle will prevent the county and the gaming company from being prepared to credibly bid for one the three downstate casino licenses New York regulators could award next year.
Both the county and Sands have made clear they intend to forge ahead regardless of Hofstra’s legal efforts. That makes a comprehensive and transparent environmental review essential to rebutting Hofstra’s claims.
It’s also critical to help expedite the legal process because New York’s higher courts are suffering through backlogs and are taking years to hear some environmental review cases.
Related News Articles
Cohen Turns to Former New York Pol for Queens Casino Advice
Newsday Slams New York Casino Process
Most Popular
Most Commented
Most Read
Last Comments ( 2 )
Hofstra is not “betting” on anything. It was clear to everyone at the time the lease was approved that it was being rushed to avoid scrutiny and laws were being blatantly violated. The County knew that if the residents became fully aware as to how massive the casino complex would be, the majority of residents would oppose the plan. This is borne out by a recent Newsday poll where Nassau County residents oppose the casino 49-42. Residents of Nassau County owe a debt of gratitude to Hofstra for holding the County accountable for its actions. The County should stop wasting millions in legal fees on an appeal and redo the lease process - this time following the laws that were designed to protect us.
Sands own environmental review seems usable ONLY as a template. There needs to be a truly independent Environmental Impact Assessment to get accurate numbers on the amount of water and energy to be used, the amount of sewage will be generated, and the amount of drilling to be done for the new well. How will our air and water be affected? Will water tables rise as they sink foundations in to support the hotel towers and parking lots? Surely we are not leaving it up to Sands to provide the necessary information for the full environmental review.